N9448BCessna 208B · 1988

On July 8, 2019, about 1505 Alaska daylight time, Grant Aviation flight GV262 Cessna 208B airplane, N9448B, was destroyed by a post-crash fire during an accident at the Bethel Airport (BET), Bethel, Alaska. The commercial pilot and five passengers sustained minor injuries. The airplane was operated under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 scheduled commuter flight.

The pilot stated that the accident flight was the last of a 5-leg scheduled passenger flight from Newtok Airport to the company’s base airport, BET. After contacting the BET air traffic control tower (ATCT) about 10 miles west of the airport, the pilot offered to use runway 12, because it was a more expeditious arrival from the west, and he wanted to "make it easier" for the tower controller who was very busy with arrivals of other airplanes using runways 1L and 1R. The pilot reported that, about 4 miles southwest of the airport, the tower controller cleared him to land on runway 12. He selected a higher-than-normal traffic pattern altitude, due to the limited visibility and terrain located on the west side of the airport. He conducted a visual approach to runway 12, with an increased rate of descent and full flaps.

During the landing flare, the airplane floated about halfway down the runway, and the pilot executed a go-around due to insufficient runway stopping distance remaining. He advanced the throttle to maximum, retracted the flaps to 20°, increased the airplane's pitch attitude as the main landing gear momentarily touched down. The pilot transmitted on the tower frequency that he was going around and the ATCT local controller (LC) instructed him twice to turn left immediately. The pilot stated that he was aware that an airplane was on short final approach to runway 1L, but he did not know where the other airplanes were and was concerned about conflicting with cross traffic flow. In an attempt to comply with tower instructions and deconflict with traffic, he applied left aileron and the airplane stalled, rolled right and descended, impacting the ground in a right-wing-low attitude. He attempted to regain control and he recalled selecting the flaps up. The airplane came to rest on its right side in the grass covered drainage ditch between runways 1L and 1R. The pilot stated that he saw fire through the right window, and immediately went to the back of the airplane to help with the evacuation of the two children and three adult passengers through the left cargo door before the airplane was consumed by fire. See figure 1 for BET airport diagram and accident site information.

Figure 1. Airport Google Earth image with runways and accident site labeled.

The LC stated that after the airplane lifted off, the right wing dropped down and it appeared that the airplane was turning right, which would have placed it in direct conflict with an airplane landing on runway 1L, so he “stepped” on the pilot’s go-around radio call and instructed him to turn left. When the airplane did not turn left, but rather lowered the right wing again, he again directed the pilot to turn left, but the airplane was already in a stalled attitude at that time.

The ATCT ground controller, who was also a pilot, witnessed the entire sequence and stated that the airplane appeared very high and fast over the threshold. It touched down about halfway down the runway, “bled off a lot of airspeed,” and then climbed at a very flat profile. The airplane then appeared to touch down briefly on runway 1L, raise the nose high and bank right, before it stalled and impacted the right side of the runway.

A review of air traffic control audio files and automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B) data that was processed through the L3 Harris Technologies Inc. OpsVue program indicated that the airplane arrived about 0.1 mile from the runway threshold at 149 ft above runway threshold height and 110 knots of groundspeed, and then was 49 ft over the threshold at 98 knots of groundspeed. At 1506:47, while the airplane was climbing out during the go-around at the departure end of the runway, the LC urgently instructed “left turn out immediately.” Seven seconds later, as another airplane arrived at the runway 1L threshold for landing and the accident airplane crossed runway 1L, the LC instructed “four eight Bravo, make a left” and the frequency unkeyed. Refer to figure 2.

Figure 2. ADS-B data for accident airplane (red) and landing traffic (blue) with ATCT audio excerpts from LC frequency.

A review of the postaccident photographs revealed that the left wing separated from the airframe and came to rest on the right wing. The right wing exhibited a 30° deformation upward about 8 ft from the wingtip and the right aileron was separated. The flaps were attached and appeared to be in the retracted position. The propeller was attached to the engine and exhibited span wise torsional twist, indicative of high power at impact. The empennage was upright and partially detached at the aft fuselage and exhibited minor buckling damage. The fuselage and wing root area were destroyed by fire.

BET runway 12 is an 1,858 ft gravel runway that transitions to asphalt at the southeast end and terminates at parallel runways 1L and 1R. The landing distance required to stop based on performance charts in the pilot operating handbook is 950 ft for a short field landing approach at 78 knots and full flaps. Refer to figure 2 for a BET airport diagram.

At the time of the accident, the temperature was reported at 88°F and the wind was light and variable at 3 knots. According to archived weather data, the average high temperature for July in Bethel was 63°F.

The airplane was estimated to have weighed about 7,500 lbs at the time of the accident and the estimated weight and balance was within limits. There is no power on stall speed published for the airplane.

A stall is an aerodynamic condition which occurs when smooth airflow over the airplane’s wings is disrupted, resulting in loss of lift. Specifically, a stall occurs when the angle of attack (AOA)—the angle between the chord line of the wing and the relative wind—exceeds the wing’s critical AOA. It is possible to exceed the critical AOA at any airspeed, at any attitude, and at any power setting.